Sunday, September 23, 2012

Factors affecting Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING:-

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is generally defined as the clinical laboratory measurement of a chemical parameter that, with appropriate medical interpretation, will directly influence drug prescribing procedures by combining knowledge of pharmaceutics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.
TDM enables the assessment of the efficacy and safety of a particular medication in a variety of clinical settings the goal of this process is to individualize therapeutic regimens for optimal patient benefit.

CLINICAL USEFULNESS OF TDM:-

Clinical usefulness of TDM Maximize efficacy of drug Avoiding toxicity Identifying therapeutic failure Facilitating dose adjustment Facilitating therapeutic effects

Factors Affecting TDM:-

1.      Patient demographics
2.      Patient Compliance
3.      Individuals capacity to distribute/metabolize/excrete the drug
4.      Genetic factors
5.       Concomitant disease, Tropical disease and nutritional deficiencies
6.       Alternative system of medicine
7.       Ethnic differences and extrapolation of the normal range
8.      Alcohol & Tobacco use
9.       Quality of medication and generic formulation
10.   Control of drug assay
11.  Medication or sampling errors
12.  Laboratory errors
13.   Cost effectiveness












1.     Patient demographics:-
The patient’s age sex body weight and ethnicity should be considered when interpreting TDM results. Age sex and lean body weight are particularly important for renally cleared drugs as knowledge of these allows calculation of creatinine clearance. Ethnicity may be an important consideration for TDM of some hepatically cleared drugs.

2.     Patient Compliance:-
If the concentration of the drug is lower than expected, the possibility of non compliance should be considered before a dose increase is recommended. The simplest way to check for non-compliance is to ask the patient in a non judgemental way about their compliance. However in some situations for example, a patient who is confused after a seizure, this may not be a reliable method.

3.     Individuals capacity to distribute/metabolize/excrete the drug:-
Pharmacokinetics is the study of what the body does to a drug after
          administration. It is divided into four categories:
§  Absorption,
§  Distribution,
§  Metabolism and
§   Excretion.
Major Pharmacokinetics Processes Affecting Drug Concentration
§   Distribution
§   Absorption
§  Elimination (metabolism & excretion)
§  Time (hours) 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
§  Serum concentration

Ø  Absorption:
Absorption refers to the ability and process of a dosage reaching the
bloodstream. There are different routes of drug administration. The most
common are:
§  Oral
§  Intramuscular
§  Subcutaneous
§  Rectal
§  Transdermal
§  Intravenous
Drugs administered intravenously do not require absorption since they
immediately reach the vascular system. Oral agents must first be absorbed into the GI tract and may be metabolized there or by hepatic enzymes prior to reaching the circulation.
Transdermally administered drugs do not pass through either the GI tract or the liver.

The rate of absorption and extent of absorption are dependent on various factors such as:
§  Drug formulation
§  Manufacturer
§  Route of administration
§  Intra-individual variations
Another aspect of absorption is bioavailability. This is the fraction
of the administered dose that reaches the systemic circulation.
Bioavailability is 100% for IV injection.

Ø  Distribution:
Once the drug is absorbed, a certain drug concentration is reached
in the body. The volume in which the drug is distributed is a product
of the drug’s dose divided by the plasma concentration.
(Vd) = dose/plasma concentration
The absolute bioavailability of a drug, when administered by an extra vascular route, is usually less than one (i.e. F<1 o:p="o:p">
The distribution phase represents the early period in the dose/time curve
when the drug is being circulated in the blood throughout the body and
into the body fluids, organs and tissues. Vd is directly related to the half-life of the drug.
A drug with a large Vd compared to a drug with a small Vd, given similar clearance rates, will have a longer half-life and remain in the body longer.
Half-life refers to the time required for the concentration of the drug
in the body to be reduced by one half. For example if a drug has a half life of four hours, four hours after the initial dose, 50% of the drug will
be removed.
Eight hours after the initial dose, half of the remaining drug
(25% of total) will be removed, for a total of 75% having been removed
at that time, and so on.
Half-life information is used to determine the correct drug dose required to attain the desired therapeutic range.





Ø  Metabolism:
Drug metabolism occurs primarily in the liver, and also in the GI tract.
Drug metabolism is the process in which the body breaks down
and converts the drug into active chemical substances. Knowing how
the drug is metabolized is important for several reasons. When two
or more drugs are administered at similar times how they metabolize
will impact any drug interactions. In addition, drug metabolites can be
either protein bound (inactive) or free (active). The drug dosage
will depend on how the drug metabolizes. Factors that impact drug
metabolism includes genetics, environment, nutrition, and age.

Ø  Excretion:
Drug excretion from the body occurs through the kidneys, or fluids
excreted through the lungs, GI or skin. Renal dysfunction reduces drug
clearance and may contribute to drug accumulation and increased
risk of adverse drug effects.

Some other factors also affect these parameters are-

·         Age: In general, drugs metabolized more slowly in foetal, neonatal, and geriatric populations
·         Physical properties of the drug (hydrophobicity, pKa, solubility)
·         If the drug is administered in a fed or fasted state
·         Gastric emptying rate
·         Circadian differences
·         Interactions with other drugs (e.g. antacids, alcohol, nicotine)
·         Interactions with other foods (e.g. grapefruit juice, pomello, cranberry juice)
·         Transporters: Substrate of an efflux transporter (e.g. P-glycoprotein)
·         Health of the GI tract
·         Enzyme induction/inhibition by other drugs/foods:
o   Enzyme induction (increase rate of metabolism). e.g. Phenytoin barbiturates, carbamazepine, glutethimide, primidone, rifampicin induces CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, , which is involved in a drug's metabolism may reduce the drug's activity
o   Enzyme inhibition (decrease rate of metabolism). E.g. which is involved in drug metabolism, resulting in ↑ drug activity, prolonging the action of various drugs, including chloramphenicol, cimetidine, disulfiram (Antabuse), isoniazid, methyldopa, metronidazole, phenylbutazone and sulphonamides, grapefruit juice inhibits CYP3A --> higher nifedipine concentrations,
·         Individual Variation in Metabolic Differences
·         Phenotypic differences, enter hepatic circulation, diet, gender.

4.     Genetic factors: - It plays an as yet poorly defined role in therapeutic drug monitoring, as is the case of the poor ability of some racial groups to acetylated drugs.


5.     Concomitant disease, Tropical disease and nutritional deficiencies:-
Ill health is a serious problem impeding progress in most developing countries. This includes diseases highly prevalent in these countries such as infections, diarrhoea, worm infestations, tuberculosis, neurocysticercosis and nutritional deficiencies, plus a higher proportion of patients with diabetes and AIDS. Patients often seek treatment late in their illness. Nutritional deficiencies are often subclinical and escape detection and they have been shown to affect drug pharmacokinetics.

Felder & Steware have shown that the rural black population in South Africa often has albumin concentrations below the accepted reference range of 35–50 g l−1. In a study which estimated free and total phenytoin and albumin levels in these patients, they were able to show that, because albumin levels are lower, corrected phenytoin concentrations using the Sheiner Tozer equation should be used and not the total phenytoin concentrations which can be misleading. However, in our urban situation, over 100 consecutive patients screened were found to have normal albumin levels. Iron deficiency anaemia is common and may affect drug metabolism and absorption although we have not found it to affect phenytoin pharmacokinetics. AIDS is a major problem in the developing world, with India estimated to have the largest number of cases of any country in the world. AIDS has been shown to reduce the absorption of antituberculous drugs and there are specific recommendations for monitoring antituberculin drug levels in these patients.

6.     Alternative system of medicine:-
India is unique in having at least three systems of medicine coexisting with ‘western’ medicine (allopathy); ayurveda, homeopathy and unani. Some allopathic practitioners often coprescribe medicines from the alternative systems particularly for chronic disorders. Our own experience in the TDM clinic identified an interaction with ‘shankhapushpi’ an ayurvedic preparation purported to be an anti epileptic and memory enhancer. A patient with a history of generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures, well controlled and with plasma phenytoin levels within the therapeutic range, presented with sudden loss of seizure control. History revealed that he was taking ‘shakhapushpi’ and plasma analysis showed that his phenytoin level had dropped. Experimental studies showed that this drug had both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with phenytoin.

Two other interesting patients who presented to the TDM clinic had GTC epilepsy and had switched over to ‘ayurvedic’ tablets and discontinued their anticonvulsant medication. The patients had both phenytoin and phenobarbitone detectable in their plasma and analysis of the tablets showed that they contained a combination of phenytoin and phenobarbitone. Herbal medicines are being used by an increasing number of patients worldwide, who may not necessarily advise their clinicians of the concomitant use. Interaction with conventional drugs have been documented for liquorice, ginseng, tannic acids, plantain, uzara root, hawthorn and kyushin all of which may be prescribed by practitioners of the alternative systems.

7.     Ethnic differences and extrapolation of the normal range:-
The fact that interpopulation variations in drug pharmacokinetics can result in higher or lower plasma drug concentrations is well known. For example, the metabolism of phenytoin via para-hydroxylation is subject to wide interindividual variation. Mani has reported that the effective anticonvulsant dosage may be lower in Indians than in Europeans while other authors have indicated that ethnic differences may have a significant influence on the plasma clearance of phenytoin.

Shelley studied possible ethnic differences in the pharmacokinetics of lithium carbonate in Caucasian and Afro-Caribbean volunteers under standardized conditions. There was a non statistically significant trend towards more rapid distribution and elimination, smaller area under the serum time-concentration curve and greater urinary excretion in the Caucasian group. Lee studied the variability in plasma phenobarbitone concentration in Asian children in Singapore. This included Chinese, Malays and Indians and the mean phenobarbitone dosage required to produce a plasma level of 15 μg ml−1 was 5.2 mg kg−1day−1 and varied between the three groups although the differences were not statistically significant.

The standard therapeutic ranges for interpretation of TDM data are derived from population studies in the west. Nomograms used for dosage calculations for phenytoin have been made using pharmacokinetic data from developed countries but the same nomograms are used in developing countries. When we compared the expected phenytoin values (using the nomogram) with actual phenytoin values in our patients after dose adjustment; we found 10–15% lower levels than calculated values. This could be accounted for by pharmacokinetic differences or different formulations with lower bioavailability.

8.     Alcohol & Tobacco use:-
Chronic use of alcohol has been shown to cause non-specific hepatic microsomal enzyme induction, resulting in increased clearance and decreased serum concentrations of hepatically cleared drugs such as Phenytoin.
Cigarette smoking increases the hepatic clearance of theophylline and patients who have recently stopped smoking may have unexpectedly high theophylline concentrations.

9.     Quality of medication and generic formulation:-
World wide, there is increasing prescription of generic products which are actively promoted by health authorities for economic reasons. The prescription of generics by primary care physicians has risen in England from 35% in 1985 to 55% in 1995. Quality of products (drug content, bioavailability) is important especially for drugs with a narrow margin of safety which is just those drugs for which TDM is relevant.

In developing countries, there is a constant attempt to provide drugs to the majority of the population at low cost and bioavailability studies are done only at the time of obtaining marketing approval. Authors have already reported from Pakistan and Vietnam that quality of drugs used may be substandard and need additional quality control. Given that generic drugs are freely available in developing countries, quality assurance of manufacturing practice is essential. The TDM service can be used to provide an important early indication of substandard drugs. For example, we have identified substandard products by observing low levels of phenytoin in patients otherwise known to be compliant and previously having levels in the therapeutic range.

10.                         Quality control in drug assays:-
For TDM programs, quality control is vitally important [3] and in developing countries there are hardly any procedures for laboratory accreditation or external quality control. In India, one centre in Southern India offers an external quality control program (for biochemical tests).



For drug levels, however, there is none and most departments and laboratories such as ours use overseas quality control programs although this increases the cost of running the laboratory. In view of the mushrooming of private ‘pathobiochem’ laboratories which offer a range of pathology and biochemical investigations, the state Food and Drug Administration’s are proposing laboratory inspections for standardizing and ensuring quality of results. There are no such proposals for drug assay laboratories.

11.                         Medication or sampling errors:-
In cases where the TDM result is incompatible with drug administration records, the possibility of a medication or sampling error should be considered. For Example, the drug may have been given to the wrong patient, or blood may have been mistakenly drawn from a patient in a neighbouring bed.

12.                         Laboratory errors:-
If a laboratory error is suspected, the laboratory should be contacted and asked to repeat the assay.
Alternatively, a new blood sample can be drawn and sent to a different laboratory for assay.

13.                         Cost effectiveness:-
Rapid and cost-effective measurement of most drugs for which TDM is indicated can be achieved using commercial kits run on automated analysers using a number of different methodologies including fluorescence polarisation immunoassay.  

Chromatographic and ultrafiltration techniques are time consuming and require highly trained staff. It is most cost-effective for these assays to be performed in only a limited number of centres of excellence with appropriately qualified scientists and stringent quality assurance.

For many drugs the analytical techniques used, and their associated costs, dictate that assays are performed in batches at predetermined times and the drug concentrations may consequently not be available for a number of dosage intervals.




Bibliography:-

1.      A Textbook of Clinical Pharmacy Practice (Second Edition)
                G Parthasarathi, Karin Nyfort-Hansen & Milap C Nahata (Eds.)
      2012; 331 pp; 978-81-7371-756-7
N J Gogtay, N A Kshirsagar, S S Dalvi Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 November; 48(5): 649–654. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00088.x
PMCID: PMC2014358
3.      Therapeutic drug monitoring
D.J. Birkett, Professor of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide
4.      Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) - An Educational Guide

2 comments:

Tweet

Online Library

The New England Journal of Medicine

The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology