Sunday, September 23, 2012

Factors affecting Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING:-

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is generally defined as the clinical laboratory measurement of a chemical parameter that, with appropriate medical interpretation, will directly influence drug prescribing procedures by combining knowledge of pharmaceutics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.
TDM enables the assessment of the efficacy and safety of a particular medication in a variety of clinical settings the goal of this process is to individualize therapeutic regimens for optimal patient benefit.

CLINICAL USEFULNESS OF TDM:-

Clinical usefulness of TDM Maximize efficacy of drug Avoiding toxicity Identifying therapeutic failure Facilitating dose adjustment Facilitating therapeutic effects

Factors Affecting TDM:-

1.      Patient demographics
2.      Patient Compliance
3.      Individuals capacity to distribute/metabolize/excrete the drug
4.      Genetic factors
5.       Concomitant disease, Tropical disease and nutritional deficiencies
6.       Alternative system of medicine
7.       Ethnic differences and extrapolation of the normal range
8.      Alcohol & Tobacco use
9.       Quality of medication and generic formulation
10.   Control of drug assay
11.  Medication or sampling errors
12.  Laboratory errors
13.   Cost effectiveness












1.     Patient demographics:-
The patient’s age sex body weight and ethnicity should be considered when interpreting TDM results. Age sex and lean body weight are particularly important for renally cleared drugs as knowledge of these allows calculation of creatinine clearance. Ethnicity may be an important consideration for TDM of some hepatically cleared drugs.

2.     Patient Compliance:-
If the concentration of the drug is lower than expected, the possibility of non compliance should be considered before a dose increase is recommended. The simplest way to check for non-compliance is to ask the patient in a non judgemental way about their compliance. However in some situations for example, a patient who is confused after a seizure, this may not be a reliable method.

3.     Individuals capacity to distribute/metabolize/excrete the drug:-
Pharmacokinetics is the study of what the body does to a drug after
          administration. It is divided into four categories:
§  Absorption,
§  Distribution,
§  Metabolism and
§   Excretion.
Major Pharmacokinetics Processes Affecting Drug Concentration
§   Distribution
§   Absorption
§  Elimination (metabolism & excretion)
§  Time (hours) 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
§  Serum concentration

Ø  Absorption:
Absorption refers to the ability and process of a dosage reaching the
bloodstream. There are different routes of drug administration. The most
common are:
§  Oral
§  Intramuscular
§  Subcutaneous
§  Rectal
§  Transdermal
§  Intravenous
Drugs administered intravenously do not require absorption since they
immediately reach the vascular system. Oral agents must first be absorbed into the GI tract and may be metabolized there or by hepatic enzymes prior to reaching the circulation.
Transdermally administered drugs do not pass through either the GI tract or the liver.

The rate of absorption and extent of absorption are dependent on various factors such as:
§  Drug formulation
§  Manufacturer
§  Route of administration
§  Intra-individual variations
Another aspect of absorption is bioavailability. This is the fraction
of the administered dose that reaches the systemic circulation.
Bioavailability is 100% for IV injection.

Ø  Distribution:
Once the drug is absorbed, a certain drug concentration is reached
in the body. The volume in which the drug is distributed is a product
of the drug’s dose divided by the plasma concentration.
(Vd) = dose/plasma concentration
The absolute bioavailability of a drug, when administered by an extra vascular route, is usually less than one (i.e. F<1 o:p="o:p">
The distribution phase represents the early period in the dose/time curve
when the drug is being circulated in the blood throughout the body and
into the body fluids, organs and tissues. Vd is directly related to the half-life of the drug.
A drug with a large Vd compared to a drug with a small Vd, given similar clearance rates, will have a longer half-life and remain in the body longer.
Half-life refers to the time required for the concentration of the drug
in the body to be reduced by one half. For example if a drug has a half life of four hours, four hours after the initial dose, 50% of the drug will
be removed.
Eight hours after the initial dose, half of the remaining drug
(25% of total) will be removed, for a total of 75% having been removed
at that time, and so on.
Half-life information is used to determine the correct drug dose required to attain the desired therapeutic range.





Ø  Metabolism:
Drug metabolism occurs primarily in the liver, and also in the GI tract.
Drug metabolism is the process in which the body breaks down
and converts the drug into active chemical substances. Knowing how
the drug is metabolized is important for several reasons. When two
or more drugs are administered at similar times how they metabolize
will impact any drug interactions. In addition, drug metabolites can be
either protein bound (inactive) or free (active). The drug dosage
will depend on how the drug metabolizes. Factors that impact drug
metabolism includes genetics, environment, nutrition, and age.

Ø  Excretion:
Drug excretion from the body occurs through the kidneys, or fluids
excreted through the lungs, GI or skin. Renal dysfunction reduces drug
clearance and may contribute to drug accumulation and increased
risk of adverse drug effects.

Some other factors also affect these parameters are-

·         Age: In general, drugs metabolized more slowly in foetal, neonatal, and geriatric populations
·         Physical properties of the drug (hydrophobicity, pKa, solubility)
·         If the drug is administered in a fed or fasted state
·         Gastric emptying rate
·         Circadian differences
·         Interactions with other drugs (e.g. antacids, alcohol, nicotine)
·         Interactions with other foods (e.g. grapefruit juice, pomello, cranberry juice)
·         Transporters: Substrate of an efflux transporter (e.g. P-glycoprotein)
·         Health of the GI tract
·         Enzyme induction/inhibition by other drugs/foods:
o   Enzyme induction (increase rate of metabolism). e.g. Phenytoin barbiturates, carbamazepine, glutethimide, primidone, rifampicin induces CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, , which is involved in a drug's metabolism may reduce the drug's activity
o   Enzyme inhibition (decrease rate of metabolism). E.g. which is involved in drug metabolism, resulting in ↑ drug activity, prolonging the action of various drugs, including chloramphenicol, cimetidine, disulfiram (Antabuse), isoniazid, methyldopa, metronidazole, phenylbutazone and sulphonamides, grapefruit juice inhibits CYP3A --> higher nifedipine concentrations,
·         Individual Variation in Metabolic Differences
·         Phenotypic differences, enter hepatic circulation, diet, gender.

4.     Genetic factors: - It plays an as yet poorly defined role in therapeutic drug monitoring, as is the case of the poor ability of some racial groups to acetylated drugs.


5.     Concomitant disease, Tropical disease and nutritional deficiencies:-
Ill health is a serious problem impeding progress in most developing countries. This includes diseases highly prevalent in these countries such as infections, diarrhoea, worm infestations, tuberculosis, neurocysticercosis and nutritional deficiencies, plus a higher proportion of patients with diabetes and AIDS. Patients often seek treatment late in their illness. Nutritional deficiencies are often subclinical and escape detection and they have been shown to affect drug pharmacokinetics.

Felder & Steware have shown that the rural black population in South Africa often has albumin concentrations below the accepted reference range of 35–50 g l−1. In a study which estimated free and total phenytoin and albumin levels in these patients, they were able to show that, because albumin levels are lower, corrected phenytoin concentrations using the Sheiner Tozer equation should be used and not the total phenytoin concentrations which can be misleading. However, in our urban situation, over 100 consecutive patients screened were found to have normal albumin levels. Iron deficiency anaemia is common and may affect drug metabolism and absorption although we have not found it to affect phenytoin pharmacokinetics. AIDS is a major problem in the developing world, with India estimated to have the largest number of cases of any country in the world. AIDS has been shown to reduce the absorption of antituberculous drugs and there are specific recommendations for monitoring antituberculin drug levels in these patients.

6.     Alternative system of medicine:-
India is unique in having at least three systems of medicine coexisting with ‘western’ medicine (allopathy); ayurveda, homeopathy and unani. Some allopathic practitioners often coprescribe medicines from the alternative systems particularly for chronic disorders. Our own experience in the TDM clinic identified an interaction with ‘shankhapushpi’ an ayurvedic preparation purported to be an anti epileptic and memory enhancer. A patient with a history of generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures, well controlled and with plasma phenytoin levels within the therapeutic range, presented with sudden loss of seizure control. History revealed that he was taking ‘shakhapushpi’ and plasma analysis showed that his phenytoin level had dropped. Experimental studies showed that this drug had both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with phenytoin.

Two other interesting patients who presented to the TDM clinic had GTC epilepsy and had switched over to ‘ayurvedic’ tablets and discontinued their anticonvulsant medication. The patients had both phenytoin and phenobarbitone detectable in their plasma and analysis of the tablets showed that they contained a combination of phenytoin and phenobarbitone. Herbal medicines are being used by an increasing number of patients worldwide, who may not necessarily advise their clinicians of the concomitant use. Interaction with conventional drugs have been documented for liquorice, ginseng, tannic acids, plantain, uzara root, hawthorn and kyushin all of which may be prescribed by practitioners of the alternative systems.

7.     Ethnic differences and extrapolation of the normal range:-
The fact that interpopulation variations in drug pharmacokinetics can result in higher or lower plasma drug concentrations is well known. For example, the metabolism of phenytoin via para-hydroxylation is subject to wide interindividual variation. Mani has reported that the effective anticonvulsant dosage may be lower in Indians than in Europeans while other authors have indicated that ethnic differences may have a significant influence on the plasma clearance of phenytoin.

Shelley studied possible ethnic differences in the pharmacokinetics of lithium carbonate in Caucasian and Afro-Caribbean volunteers under standardized conditions. There was a non statistically significant trend towards more rapid distribution and elimination, smaller area under the serum time-concentration curve and greater urinary excretion in the Caucasian group. Lee studied the variability in plasma phenobarbitone concentration in Asian children in Singapore. This included Chinese, Malays and Indians and the mean phenobarbitone dosage required to produce a plasma level of 15 μg ml−1 was 5.2 mg kg−1day−1 and varied between the three groups although the differences were not statistically significant.

The standard therapeutic ranges for interpretation of TDM data are derived from population studies in the west. Nomograms used for dosage calculations for phenytoin have been made using pharmacokinetic data from developed countries but the same nomograms are used in developing countries. When we compared the expected phenytoin values (using the nomogram) with actual phenytoin values in our patients after dose adjustment; we found 10–15% lower levels than calculated values. This could be accounted for by pharmacokinetic differences or different formulations with lower bioavailability.

8.     Alcohol & Tobacco use:-
Chronic use of alcohol has been shown to cause non-specific hepatic microsomal enzyme induction, resulting in increased clearance and decreased serum concentrations of hepatically cleared drugs such as Phenytoin.
Cigarette smoking increases the hepatic clearance of theophylline and patients who have recently stopped smoking may have unexpectedly high theophylline concentrations.

9.     Quality of medication and generic formulation:-
World wide, there is increasing prescription of generic products which are actively promoted by health authorities for economic reasons. The prescription of generics by primary care physicians has risen in England from 35% in 1985 to 55% in 1995. Quality of products (drug content, bioavailability) is important especially for drugs with a narrow margin of safety which is just those drugs for which TDM is relevant.

In developing countries, there is a constant attempt to provide drugs to the majority of the population at low cost and bioavailability studies are done only at the time of obtaining marketing approval. Authors have already reported from Pakistan and Vietnam that quality of drugs used may be substandard and need additional quality control. Given that generic drugs are freely available in developing countries, quality assurance of manufacturing practice is essential. The TDM service can be used to provide an important early indication of substandard drugs. For example, we have identified substandard products by observing low levels of phenytoin in patients otherwise known to be compliant and previously having levels in the therapeutic range.

10.                         Quality control in drug assays:-
For TDM programs, quality control is vitally important [3] and in developing countries there are hardly any procedures for laboratory accreditation or external quality control. In India, one centre in Southern India offers an external quality control program (for biochemical tests).



For drug levels, however, there is none and most departments and laboratories such as ours use overseas quality control programs although this increases the cost of running the laboratory. In view of the mushrooming of private ‘pathobiochem’ laboratories which offer a range of pathology and biochemical investigations, the state Food and Drug Administration’s are proposing laboratory inspections for standardizing and ensuring quality of results. There are no such proposals for drug assay laboratories.

11.                         Medication or sampling errors:-
In cases where the TDM result is incompatible with drug administration records, the possibility of a medication or sampling error should be considered. For Example, the drug may have been given to the wrong patient, or blood may have been mistakenly drawn from a patient in a neighbouring bed.

12.                         Laboratory errors:-
If a laboratory error is suspected, the laboratory should be contacted and asked to repeat the assay.
Alternatively, a new blood sample can be drawn and sent to a different laboratory for assay.

13.                         Cost effectiveness:-
Rapid and cost-effective measurement of most drugs for which TDM is indicated can be achieved using commercial kits run on automated analysers using a number of different methodologies including fluorescence polarisation immunoassay.  

Chromatographic and ultrafiltration techniques are time consuming and require highly trained staff. It is most cost-effective for these assays to be performed in only a limited number of centres of excellence with appropriately qualified scientists and stringent quality assurance.

For many drugs the analytical techniques used, and their associated costs, dictate that assays are performed in batches at predetermined times and the drug concentrations may consequently not be available for a number of dosage intervals.




Bibliography:-

1.      A Textbook of Clinical Pharmacy Practice (Second Edition)
                G Parthasarathi, Karin Nyfort-Hansen & Milap C Nahata (Eds.)
      2012; 331 pp; 978-81-7371-756-7
N J Gogtay, N A Kshirsagar, S S Dalvi Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 November; 48(5): 649–654. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00088.x
PMCID: PMC2014358
3.      Therapeutic drug monitoring
D.J. Birkett, Professor of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide
4.      Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) - An Educational Guide
Hi!Friends
The 7th Asian Conference on Pharmacoepidemiology
Welcome To ACPE
Come and join us in Bengaluru (Bangalore) for the 7th Asian Conference on Pharmacoepidemiology.
Since the first Asian Conference on Pharmacoepidemiology (ACPE) held in Shanghai, China in 2006, five ACPEs have been organized. They were held in Tokyo (2007 and 2010), Seoul (2008), and Tainan (2009), Beijing 2011. Now the International Society of Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE), JSS University (JSSU) and the Indian Society for Clinical Research (ISCR) have joined to host the 7th ACPE, which will be held from October 26-28, 2012 in Bengaluru, India.
On behalf of the 7th ACPE Steering Committee, we would like to welcome you to Bengaluru to meet together for discussion of progress made by fellow scientists and practitioners in drug safety and effectiveness research. This work has resulted in improved safety and judiciousness of use of medicines in treating and preventing disease both globally, and in the Asia Pacific region specifically.
The theme of ACPE 7 is 'Medication safety and effectiveness: Building evidence through good pharmacoepidemiology practice'. The meeting will feature notable international experts who will address the latest developments and challenges in pharmacoepidemiology both in plenary as well as symposia sessions. Sessions in which researchers and clinical practitioners are invited to present and discuss their own research and clinical experiences in drug utilization and pharmacovigilance have always been an integral part of ACPE meetings.
Two pre-conference educational programs are also available to registrants. One provides a workshop-style introduction to pharmacoepidemiology skills suited for the Indian context, led by outstanding international teachers in the field, and the other covers more advanced topics in pharmacoepidemiology delivered by renowned international experts. ACPE7 will include exhibits, social events and other opportunities to meet and share experiences with colleagues from India, Asia and all around the world.
We will warmly welcome colleagues and friends joining us in October 2012 for this important scientific meeting where Pharmacoepidemiology, more effective drug utilization, and better medication risk management will be the prime focus.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Nuremberg Code for Clinical Trials

Nuremberg Code

 

Introduction:

The Nuremberg Code is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation set as a result of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials at the end of the Second World War. The "doctors' trial" was the first of the war crimes trials. The trial was officially titled United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al., but is more commonly referred to as the "Doctors' Trial"; it began on December 9, 1946. The Doctors Trial lasted 140 days. The first tenet of the code is very clear: "The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential." Today, the Nuremberg Code is the most important influence on U.S. law governing human medical research.

 

OBJECTIVES OF DOCTOR'S TRIAL

The trial was conducted for:

         Freezing, 

         Malaria, 

         LOST Gas, 

         Sulphanilamide,

         Bone, Muscle and Nerve Regeneration

         Bone Transplantation,

         Sea-Water,

         Epidemic Jaundice,

         Sterilization. and 

         Typhus Experiments.

 

 

 

COURT DISCUSSION

 

On August 19, 1947, the judges delivered their verdict in the "Doctors' Trial" against Karl Brandt and several others. They also delivered their opinion on medical experimentation on human beings. Several of the accused had argued that their experiments differed little from pre-war ones. But there was no law that differentiated between legal and illegal experiments.

 

JUDGEMENT

 

After hearing 85 witnesses and examining 1,471 documents that were presented, judgment was pronounced on August 19, 1947 with sentencing following on the next day. Of the 23 defendants, 7 were sentenced the death by hanging (carried out at Landsberg Prison), 9 were given prison terms, and 7 were found not guilty, were involved in Nazi human experimentation and mass murder. Joseph Mengele "Angel of death" , one of the leading Nazi doctors, had evaded capture.

 

INDICTMENTS

 

         Count one à the common design or conspiracy

         Count two à war crimes

         Count three à crimes against humanity

         Count four à membership in criminal organization schutzstaffel

 

A.    Defendants got death

 

         Karl Brandt : Death, Charged for 1,2,3,4.

         Viktor Brack: Death, Charged for 1,2,3,4.

         Rudolf Brandt: Death, Charged for 1,2,3,4.

         Karl Gebhardt: Death, Charged for 1,2,3,4.

         Waldemar Hoven:  Death, Charged for 1,2,3,4.

         Joachim Mrugowsky: Death, Charged for 1,2,3,4.

         Wolfram Sievers:   Death, Charged for 1,2,3,4.

 

B.     Defendants got imprisonment

 

1.      Hermann Becker-Freyseng

2.      Wilhelm Beiglböck

3.      Fritz Fischer

4.      Karl Genzken

5.      Siegfried Handloser

6.      Herta Oberheuser

7.      Helmut Poppendick

8.      Oskar Schröder

9.      Gerhard Rose

 

C.    Dfendants got acquit

 

         Adolf Pokorny

         Hans Wolfgang Romberg

         Paul Rostock

         Kurt Blome

         Siegfried Ruff

         Konrad Schäfer

         Georg August Weltz

 

 

PRINCIPLES NUREMBERG CODE 1947

The 10 points are, (all from United States National Institutes of Health)

1.      The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him/her to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2.      The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3.      The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4.      The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5.      No experiment should be conducted where there is a prior reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6.      The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7.      Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8.      The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9.      During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10.  During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

 

 

Reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181–182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949. Note that complete electronic copies of the Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuernberg [Nuremberg] Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10 are available online, as are most of the other proceedings from the Nuremberg Trials.

 

 

OTHER ATROCIUS TRIALS

 

In the Book Medical Apartheid documents many cases.

1.      In 1994, the Medical of South Carolina in Charleston was accused of enrolling poor black women into narcotic-treatment research without their knowledge.

2.      The next year in Los Angeles, an experimental measles vaccine was tested on children, mostly black and Hispanic, without their parents' consent.

3.      In 1994 and 1995, New York City law enforcement officials helped researchers coerce black parents into enrolling their boys into a study that sought to establish a genetic propensity for violence, again without their consent

 

Summary:-

 

As a direct result of the trial, the Nuremberg Code was established in 1948, stating that "The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential," making it clear that subjects should give consent and that the benefits of research must outweigh the risks.

Although it did not carry the force of law, the Nuremberg Code was the first international document which advocated voluntary participation and informed consent.

 

 

References:-

 

1.      World Medical Association. Medical Ethics Manual. The Ethics Unit of the World Medical Association: France. 2005.

2.      Baruch C. Cohen. The ethics of using medical data from Nazi experiments. 2008 [online]. Available from http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html: [Accessed on 12 January 2008].

3.      The Nuremberg Code (1947) In: Mitscherlich A, Mielke F. Doctors of infamy: the story of the Nazi medical crimes. New York: Schuman, 1949: xxiii-xxv. Also available online from http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg

4.      Reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.


VIJIT AGARWAL, B.Pharma, (Pharm.D.)
JSS College of Pharmacy,
JSS University, Mysore-15
Karnataka
Web Address-http://www.pharmahunt.blogspot.com
# 08892233843

Follow Rediff Deal ho jaye! to get exciting offers in your city everyday.

Tweet

Online Library

The New England Journal of Medicine

The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology